State Historic Tax Credits
Research has found that an effective state program leverages the use of the federal historic tax credit. For example, Missouri's state tax credit doubled the usage of the federal incentive when it was put into place. To further support the federal historic tax credit, it is essential to also advocate to protect, expand, and gain tax incentives at the state level.
To spur more private investment in older neighborhoods, 33 states have adopted laws creating credits against state taxes to provide incentives for the appropriate rehabilitation of historic buildings. (See map above.) Well-crafted state historic tax credit programs, such as those in Minnesota, North Carolina, and Virginia, increase the number of federal rehabilitation projects.
State Advocacy Campaigns
- California Aims for Historic Credit
- North Carolina's Seeks to Reinstate a Historic Tax Credit
- Oregon's Revitalize Main Street's Act
State Tax Credits for Historic Preservation: A Public Policy Report. This policy tool was produced by the National Trust for Historic Preservation and written by Harry K. Schwartz. You can use it in two ways: hand it out to your legislators, and use it to compare your state program to others.
State Historic Tax Credits Increase Use of the Federal Historic Tax Credits
- The presence of an active state tax credit program boosts the use of the federal credit on average between $15 and $35 million in certified expenditures according to research from the Washington Office of Planning. That means the states with active tax credit programs are bringing in between $3 to $7 million federal dollars, which would not otherwise be available, to the state.
Improve Kentucky’s Historic Tax Credit
To encourage more revitalization and generate more revenue for the state, please support Kentucky House Bill 424.
- Summary of House Bill 424 by Preservation Kentucky
- Letter to legislators by Preservation Kentucky
- Report on the (2014) enhanced historic tax credit program
- Summary of the (2014) enhanced historic tax credit program
The reports below quantify the numbers of direct jobs and other substantial economic impacts created through state tax incentives. They also show how the rehabilitation of historic buildings starts to pay back the state’s investment immediately through taxes on construction jobs and materials.
- Colorado (2012)
- Connecticut (2011)
- Delaware (2010)
- Georgia (2013)
- Hawaii (2007) Note: Hawaii doesn't have a credit, but Historic Hawaii researched how a tax credit would help preserve the state's heritage.
- Illinois (2013)
- Kansas (2010)
- Maine (2011)
- Maryland (2009), summary (2009), and Sustainable Communities Tax Credit Program report (2014)
- Massachusetts (2009), summary, update (2011), and Urban Land Institute report
- Minnesota (2012)
- Mississippi (2015)
- Missouri (2010) and Missouri’s Rutgers University (2002)
- North Carolina (2008) and appendix (2008)
- Ohio (2015), (2013), Cleveland State University report (2011), and Heritage Ohio report (2012)
- Oklahoma (2009)
- Pennsylvania (2011) and Young Preservationists of Pittsburgh projected benefits (2010)
- Rhode Island (2007)
- Tennessee (2014)
- Virginia (2014)
- Wisconsin (2015), Summary (2015)